Aaron Taylor-Johnson Is the Perfect James Bond for These Three Reasons

After Daniel Craig retired from portraying James Bond forever in 2022, there has been much talk about who will take on the iconic role.

Many people have been guessing which famous actors will take on the role of the next James Bond, but it seems like the decision might have been made. Recently, rumors have been spreading that Aaron Taylor-Johnson, known for his role in Bullet Train, has been officially invited to play the iconic character.

Despite not confirming the rumors, experts of James Bond have explained to Newsweek why they believe the British actor is the ideal person to portray the legendary spy.

According to Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson, the age of 33 is appropriate for Taylor-Johnson to take on the role of James Bond.

The pair dismissed gossip regarding the possibility of Idris Elba, who stars in the series Luther, taking up the role in 2022. They stated that they were actively seeking an actor who was in his thirties, as mentioned by Wilson in an interview with Deadline.

"He's got plenty of experience," he remarked. "He's not some young person fresh out of school that you can just hire and put into action. That's why someone in their thirties is better suited for the job."

Film and television expert Tim Stevens thinks that it's crucial for the lead actor in this franchise to come across as weary and seasoned due to military service and traumas endured. As a result, fans might object to a younger actor, such as Taylor-Johnson, taking on the role.

Stevens revealed to Newsweek that although Taylor-Johnson could potentially be the next James Bond, he would not be the youngest person to take on the role. That title belongs to George Lazenby, who became 007 at 29 years old.

Moreover, when Sean Connery started in the movie "Dr. No," he was a year younger than Taylor-Johnson.

Regarding business, Stevens thinks that the age of Taylor-Johnson offers to both the actor and the creators of the video lengthy enduring success.

According to him, even if he plays the role of Bond for 12 years, his age will still only be equivalent to Roger Moore's age in his first portrayal as 007.

Even though he has not yet taken charge of a major team, Taylor-Johnson has already demonstrated his ability to warm people's hearts.

He first gained fame when he starred as Robbie Jennings, the frontman of the band Stiff Dylans, in the teen romantic comedy Angus, Thongs and Perfect Snogging. In this film, he played the role of the object of affection of the female protagonist and became a heartthrob to many teenage girls in the United Kingdom.

Nonetheless, Taylor-Johnson's recent appearance on the cover of Rolling Stone magazine potentially expanded his fan base, as evidenced by him acquiring more than 31,000 new followers on Instagram within the first 72 hours of the cover's release.

According to Roy Schwartz, who studies popular culture trends, Taylor-Johnson's looks make him a very likely choice for the job.

According to Schwartz's statement to Newsweek, the actor has the ideal appearance to portray Bond. He possesses a combination of attractive yet tough looks, and his performance in Bullet Train demonstrated his ability to look splendid in formal attire.

According to Andrew Lycett, the writer of Ian Fleming: The Man Who Created James Bond, there isn't a defined appearance for Bond. Nonetheless, he must display particular characteristics that the author had in mind.

"According to Newsweek, a desirable Bond is someone who can effectively depict the persona established by Ian Fleming during the 1950s," he said.

A rugged, unscrupulous solitary figure with an ambiguous social status, despite attending esteemed institutions Eton and Fettes. This individual lives according to Fleming's intentionally unremarkable given name to either admirable or adverse effect.

Stevens concurs that the key factor is not physical appearance, such as hair or eye color. Instead, he thinks that the emerging star should possess a combination of attributes that include charm, fierceness, and comic timing.

He mentioned that an excessive amount of any single aspect could ruin the entire project. Due to this reason, Roger Moore's later movies are often criticized on the grounds of being too absurd.

Timothy Dalton and occasionally Daniel Craig were criticized for being too serious, and Pierce Brosnan was often seen as too smooth. Nonetheless, when they performed at their highest level, they were able to blend all three components in the appropriate proportion to achieve success.

Gain Muscle Mass Easily

Taylor-Johnson has gained a reputation as an action hero in recent times.

The performer has been featured in several movies including Bullet Train (2022), The King's Man (2021), Tenet (2020) a sci-fi-action-thriller by Christopher Nolan, and Kick-Ass 2 (2013). The action-comedy The Fall Guy, is set to release in May and he is part of the cast.

It is obvious that the person portraying Bond must appear capable of managing the stunts, be it leaping from structures, embarking on a risky car pursuit or steering a speedboat through crocodile-populated waters, even if they are unable to perform them in reality.

Schwartz said that Taylor-Johnson is in excellent physical condition, but he believes that James Bond doesn't have to resemble a superhero from Marvel comics.

One could make the case that Bond is similar to a superhero, but he is more authentic and attainable. This adds to his appeal.

Would Ian Fleming Approve Of Aaron Taylor-Johnson As Bond?

Lycett stated that Fleming would be astonished by the extensive publicity linked to the Bond franchise, and had an expressed desire for the books to be adapted into films.

According to him, he gave permission to the producers to proceed with creating the films of their choice.

Lycett has been very keen on having Taylor-Johnson portray the latest 007 for quite some time now. But, unless Wilson, Broccoli or the actor makes an official announcement, someone else could still get the part.

According to my comprehension, there are multiple obstacles that he must still overcome," stated Lycett.

In the early 60s, Fleming was dissatisfied with the selection of Sean Connery as Bond, as he thought that the Scottish thespian's good looks and charming personality were not suitable for portraying the covert operative.

In 1953, when I penned the initial novel, my intention was for Bond to portray a character who appeared dull and uneventful yet encountered unpredictable events," he conveyed to The New Yorker just before his passing in 1964.

Despite the fact that he was amazed by Connery's enactment, he incorporated elements of it into the succeeding James Bond books.

Stevens stated that it is probable that the writer would have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of an actor's portrayal of Bond. He also mentioned that every Bond actor has faced doubt from some fans.

Schwartz thinks that Fleming would approve of the changes the Bond character has undergone in the past 60 years. There have been six different actors who have played Bond since 1962 and each actor has added their own unique interpretation to the role.

Schwartz stated that although Fleming was specific about Bond's portrayal, she believes he wouldn't want the character to remain rigid and unchanging.

In my opinion, Taylor-Johnson would make a great person to carry the torch forward, as well as give a contemporary approach that would meet with Fleming's approval.

Newsweek is devoted to questioning traditional beliefs and identifying correlations in the pursuit of mutual understanding.

Newsweek dedicates itself to questioning traditional beliefs and establishing links in order to discover a shared foundation.