What is the Rwanda deportation scheme and when will flights take off?

Following a prolonged period of postponement, disagreements between elected officials in parliament, and litigation, the bill introduced by Rishi Sunak concerning Rwanda will finally be passed as legislation.

After a long and difficult struggle, the law for the prime minister's polarizing initiative to expel those seeking asylum to a country located in the center of a continent with no access to the sea was passed by parliament last night.

The policy has faced numerous challenges ever since it was initially introduced two years back, as a large number of individuals have been reaching Kent beaches through small boats continuously.

What is the Rwanda legislation, and why is it creating controversy? Here are a few important inquiries that have been addressed.

Can you explain the asylum plan in Rwanda?

Rishi Sunak has made five promises during his premiership, and one of them is to put a stop to the boats.

The Rwanda program is crucial to this plan, as it would entail transferring certain asylum seekers to Rwanda to have their asylum requests reviewed in that country.

If they are successful, they can remain in Rwanda or request to be given asylum in a different nation. Nevertheless, it would not be possible for them to submit an application to come back to the United Kingdom.

Government officials have expressed that this plan will function as a warning to those considering traveling to the UK "illegally" (even though the legality of traveling across the English Channel in a small watercraft is not straightforward).

Why haven't any aircraft departed yet?

According to the prime minister, the initial arrival of asylum seekers on a plane could happen around 10 to 12 weeks from now. This is yet another setback, as the prime minister had assured the public that it would take place in the spring.

It's been over two years since the initial flight attempt, which didn't happen due to last-minute legal difficulties.

Rwanda has not received any asylum seekers yet.

Although he declined to discuss confidential information regarding operations on Monday, Mr. Sunak revealed several initiatives that the government was implementing to get ready for the inaugural flights.

According to him, there are currently 2,200 spots available for detaining individuals and around 200 skilled caseworkers have undergone training to expedite the processing of claims.

Approximately 25 legal chambers are now accessible, and a group of 150 judges will be facilitating 5,000 days of proceedings, according to his statement.

According to Mr. Sunak, there are 500 well-qualified individuals available to accompany unauthorized migrants to Rwanda, and an additional 300 individuals will be trained in the upcoming week.

The UK's highest court, the Supreme Court, declared the Rwanda scheme illegal in November. The court stated that people sent to Rwanda may face the danger of being sent back to their home country, even if they had valid reasons to seek asylum. This violates international law.

Can we consider Rwanda a secure nation?

There is a lot of discussion surrounding the policy, disregarding any conflicting opinions on its effectiveness or morality. The main focus is on whether Rwanda is seen as a secure nation or not.

Even though the UK welcomed 15 Rwandan people as refugees last year, the government is still claiming that it is offering asylum to those in need.

Human Rights Watch reported that individuals who oppose the governing political party in Rwanda have been taken into custody, intimidated, and subjected to legal proceedings. There are reports that some of these people experienced physical and psychological abuse during their imprisonment, according to the organization.

Who will be impacted by the Rwanda program?

The Home Office has decided to use the deal it made with Rwanda to send back individuals who have made hazardous trips to start a new life in the UK and are seen as "unacceptable" to the UK's asylum process. This will include people who have entered the country illegally since 20 July 2020.

The UK government has stated that individuals who the Home Office plans to move to Rwanda will be singled out and handed over to the authorities in Rwanda separately and subject to individual assessment upon their entry to the UK.

Even though the deal primarily centers on those seeking asylum, any individuals who have traveled to the UK without authorization but have not yet applied for asylum can also be transferred to Rwanda according to the pact.

Check out: Evaluation: Sunak putting his premier position at risk with Rwanda proposal. What is the amount of refugees that are deported from the United Kingdom?

Can you tell me about the proceedings that took place in Parliament on Monday evening?

The Rwanda bill successfully went through the parliament on Monday and is now expected to be enforced as a law.

Following the Supreme Court's ruling in November, which stated that Rwanda was not a secure place for refugees, the government enacted a new law.

Following that, the authorities have entered into a fresh agreement with Rwanda which supposedly includes more measures to protect individuals who are moved to another location.

The recently introduced legislation required parliament to acknowledge that Rwanda is a secure place in order to validate the plan to move people to the nation under UK law.

The proposed legislation has made its way through parliament and is now awaiting approval from the royal party, although it may encounter obstacles along the way.

Those who are against the proposal and the individual asylum seekers who are informed that they will be relocated to Rwanda may consider taking legal action against the government to prevent any flights from taking place.

It is uncertain if any legal disputes would be victorious in the face of the recent legislation.

For a video player that's easier to use, we recommend using the Chrome browser.

What is the total expense involved in all of this?

According to a report from the government's financial auditors, the expense of the initiative in Rwanda could escalate to £500 million, in addition to several hundred thousand pounds for every individual who is sent back.

The authorities have declined to disclose the exact amount of additional funds they would provide to Rwanda, apart from the previously announced £290 million, according to the blog. Despite this secrecy, a National Audit Office study disclosed that there are other expenses amounting to millions of pounds, such as £11,000 per asylum seeker's airfare.

What are critics of the Rwanda refugee proposal stating after the legislation was approved?

The approval of the bill has caused renewed disapproval from non-profit groups and other entities.

The organization Amnesty International announced that such actions will have negative consequences on the ethical image of the country.

The CEO of Amnesty International UK, Sacha Deshmukh, stated that the proposed legislation is founded on a severely authoritarian idea that undermines one of the fundamental functions of the judiciary - which is to review evidence, make factual determinations and enforce the law based on such facts.

It is ridiculous that the legal system is compelled to view Rwanda as a "secure nation" without being able to take into account any opposing proof.