Who is the vainest of Whitehall? George Galloway just shades it

Politicians often seem to be oblivious to the truth. When you hear them speak, you might think they possess an excess of compassion for others. They claim they entered politics because they had an urge to help the common folk and they have an abundance of love to offer. Burdened with a feeling of obligation, they must find it tiring to maintain that level of perfection.

That's just the beginning of the tale. They use a thin covering to satisfy their ego. What truly motivates them is excessive self-admiration. If you dig deeper, you'll always discover a tremendous level of self-importance. They feel entitled to govern and are convinced that only they possess the solutions. They believe they have a special gift that sets them apart from others and can solve challenges that nobody else can.

A feeling of self-importance that only intensifies as you gain more power. This is because there are always people around you trying to please you. They hope to benefit from being associated with you and your success. When you are a part of the government, you never question whether you may be mistaken. This would be a mistake.

There is huge competition among MPs in Westminster for the title of the most self-centered. There are many potential contenders, as few of them seem to possess much self-awareness. However, if one had to pick, George Galloway is likely the most deserving of the title. He is a man who is constantly impressed by himself and has a real love for himself. He sees himself as superior to everyone else and considers his intelligence to be almost godlike. He feels that others should be grateful to have him in their lives.

George believes that he should be the leader and there is no other way to have things. Susanna Reid began the interview with Galloway on Good Morning Britain on the wrong note by mentioning Rishi Sunak's sudden press conference on the night of Galloway's victory in Rochdale. However, it seems a bit unfair for Rishi Sunak to criticize another politician for flirting with populist ideologies and extremism.

George commented, wearing his hat indoors and stating that Sunak should feel ashamed. It appears George finds it amusing that Sunak thinks of himself as a hero, but he questions whether Sunak is capable of feeling embarrassed, just like Galloway. Both individuals are unlikely to be affected by embarrassment, according to George.

During a conversation, Richard Madeley mentioned that Galloway had won in elections three times. In response, George expressed his disgust and almost spat out his reply. He clarified that he had been successful in seven elections, but for three diverse political parties. However, it's crucial to understand that George values loyalty solely towards himself.

Reid brought up the topic of the Iraq war and how Galloway was too supportive of Saddam Hussein during the war. Galloway was not interested in discussing past events or even the current situation. He was frustrated by being asked inappropriate questions. He hoped people would ask him about his intelligent ideas and his powerful charm instead.

Did those people fail to recognize that the Workers Party of Britain had a high chance of triumphing over Labour in the upcoming election? Moreover, Monty Panesar, a prominent ex-cricketer, stood as their candidate in Ealing Southall - even though he doubts the existence of climate change. This fact alone ought to solidify their lead. It seems like they will follow the path of taking over Manhattan and Berlin.

Susanna and Dicky were unsure about what they heard, so they questioned George if he was still a Muslim, as previously stated in the New Statesman in 2012. George responded with frustration, declaring that he is, in fact, a practicing Roman Catholic and denied any association with Nick Griffin. He advised them to fact-check before appearing on TV and added that they should know better considering their age. George left in a huff, and Galloway's charisma was anything but charming. The people of Rochdale should be grateful they no longer have him leading them.

Following the previous guest, Keir Starmer entered the studio. Susanna and Dicky retrieved their pre-planned questions given by Sarah Vine from the Daily Mail. This spares them from conducting their own investigations. Susanna's first question was related to Gaza. She inquired whether Keir accepts his mistake in endorsing Israel's entitlement to terminate the supply of water and electricity.

Keir attempted to be excessively polite with passive-aggressive undertones. "That's a spectacular question," he remarked, even though it was factually incorrect as he had never made such a statement. Susanna was not convinced. She protested, "You did say it because the Daily Mail claimed so." Fortunately, Dicky intervened and expressed his lack of knowledge about the Middle East, causing the conversation to become irrelevant.

"Dicky brought up the topic of transgender individuals," mentioned. Starmer had a disgusted expression on his face. In spite of that, he adjusted his previous statement and agreed with Rosie Duffield in saying that only women possess a cervix. "I am not fond of this poisonous discussion," Starmer shared his thoughts. However, GMB seems to enjoy such talks. Dicky questioned Starmer if he owed Rosie an apology, but Starmer replied that they had already discussed the issue many times, which came as a surprise to Rosie who is still waiting for her phone to get unblocked.

Angela Rayner's previous living situation from 15 years ago was briefly discussed, but it was not of interest to anyone. Soon after, there was a 30-second discussion on Labour's newly announced policy, which aims to curb shoplifting. Then, Madeley ended the conversation and told Keir he had to leave the studio. He apologized for the short time they had and hoped to see him again in the near future.

During the same time period, Sunak delivered a speech to the Society of Editors emphasizing the significance of press freedom. However, I find this statement to be insincere. Rish! does not seem to value a press that is free to report and investigate without constraint. He has actively tried to prevent satirical writers from attending his gatherings for the past year and a half, showing his aversion to any form of public scrutiny. The only journalists given the chance to ask questions are those who parrot his lies, which is very concerning with the election approaching. It appears that this is what Britain's new democracy looks like, and we are all fortunate enough to witness it firsthand.

Now, let's focus on David Cameron. The esteemed Lord Big Dave generously agreed to meet with the international relations and defence committee of the House of Lords to impart his wisdom and leadership skills. He remarked that the world is a complex place, but he is fortunate enough to be able to travel in a private jet to acknowledge the need for change. Such profound understanding cannot be purchased.

However, we did discover something. Lord Big Dave seems to be very comfortable with his status as a Lord. He even thinks it’s overdue and believes that people like him are worthy of such honors. When he said, "I'm here to serve," it was clear he was being insincere. It's all about his own ego.