Limiting Retrenchment Risks In South Africa

South African companies are looking for ways to save money, reduce the number of employees, and adjust to what customers want. If companies want to reduce the number of workers, they should think about what they will need in the future. They should make sure that they treat their employees fairly, so that everyone involved can be happy with the outcome.

Businesses in South Africa are feeling the cold of the global economic climate. Companies are trying to find ways to save money, reduce the number of employees, and adapt to changing customer habits. Some companies are shutting down branches and not hiring new people. They are also looking at different ways to manage their staff.

Lockdown rules may feel far away, but work practices have changed for good. Some firms still like working from home, but others want people back in the office. They think it's useful to have everyone together again.

Businesses have seen changes in their work practices and are reconsidering employment and organizational structures. More companies are exploring offshoring work that is not tied to specific jurisdictions. Technology improvements have made it easier to work remotely with teams all around the world. Some South African operations have received remote work that previously happened elsewhere because of lower wages and talent pools. But in other areas, jobs are being exported to even lower-cost regions or consolidated into other regions. This trend is expected to continue.

Retrenchment in South Africa involves talking with staff and the employer to come to an agreement on how to end employment. The employer can still make staff redundant if no agreement is reached. If they terminate employment without agreement, the employer must prove fairness. It can be cheaper to agree on further payments to staff instead of going to court.

South Africa's high unemployment rate (32.7%) makes it harder for employees to agree on settlements. This leads to more confrontational redundancy consultations and employees hiring lawyers. This lengthens the process and increases costs for the employer. Unrealistic employee compensation expectations also increase the number of termination disputes. Employers may decide to offer enhanced severance pay to finalize the process. Employees may prefer upfront payment instead of relying on arbitration or court.

When employers are unsure, they may choose to be overly careful to avoid legal problems. But, taking time to think about legal risks can help them make better choices when deciding how to deal with risks and disruptive employees. Delaying difficult decisions or keeping bad employees can negatively impact the business.

Laying off workers can be done without much trouble if staff feels involved. In South Africa, it's important to consider how layoffs will affect workplace diversity since there are still issues with representation. This will be an ongoing concern since progress toward diversity is slow.

When thinking about job cuts, it's important to think about double compensation risks. This is when you choose people to let go for the wrong reasons. You don't want to offer good severance deals to everyone. Instead, be careful about who you target. You don't want to be stuck with bad employees while good employees leave.

Picking which employees to lay off or keep is super important in a downsizing situation. Using old job performance as the deciding factor for choosing who to keep for new roles could mean missing out on good candidates. It's better to evaluate workers based on how suitable they are for the new job. Tests like skills assessments and personality evaluations can give a better idea of who would be a good fit. Looking back on how they did in their old role might not be the best indicator of future success. The courts agree that the focus should be on finding the right people for new positions.

South Africa's high unemployment rate is a problem. Employers need to keep their staff employed. If staff are made redundant, employers can avoid paying severance pay if they find alternative employment. This means the staff member could work for a different employer or legal entity. Employers can do this to help reduce the burden on the state fiscus and avoid unemployment benefits. Employers should look for roles within other group entities, suppliers, or service providers when considering staff redundancies. If the employer finds an alternative job that is similar to the old role, they don't need to pay statutory severance pay.

South Africa isn't difficult for redundancies, unlike other countries like Italy, France, and the Netherlands. To reduce headcount, companies need to evaluate business requirements and consider the future structure. A fair and sensible approach should be used for agreed exits with staff. If no agreement is reached, honest discussions with staff should be available. This will help companies manage the process with minimal impact on the business and remaining employees, reducing reputational risk.

This blog is only for educational and informational purposes. It is not legal advice. In some places, it may be considered "Attorney Advertising". Past results don't guarantee future ones. To learn more, visit www.bakermckenzie.com/en/client-resource-disclaimer.