Labour tempers flare over assisted dying as MP accuses peer of ‘offensive’ remarks

Subscribe For Expert Westminster Insights Via Email

Subscribe For Our Free Westminster Insights Email

Subscribe To Our Free Westminster Update Email

I’d love to receive emails about promotions, upcoming events, and news from The Independent. Please take a look at our privacy policy.

A member of the House of Lords from the Labour Party has faced criticism from one of his fellow MPs for supposedly making "extremely offensive" comments. This backlash came after he implied that the justice secretary's worries about the assisted dying legislation were based on religious beliefs.

Rachael Maskell, the Member of Parliament for York Central and a dedicated Christian, described Lord Falconer's assertion that Shabana Mahmood was attempting to "impose" her Muslim beliefs on supporters of assisted dying as "deeply offensive and discriminatory." She called on him to apologize for his remarks.

Tensions are rising among Labour members regarding the assisted dying bill, which MPs are set to vote on this Friday.

There’s a divide within Sir Keir Starmer’s government regarding this initiative. The prime minister has opted not to disclose his voting intentions, while Health Secretary Wes Streeting is set to vote against it.

In a letter to her constituents made public on Sunday, Ms. Mahmood expressed her deep worry regarding the proposed legislation, just before a significant vote in the House of Commons set for this week.

Ms. Mahmood expressed that her worries go beyond just religious beliefs; she fears it could lead to a dangerous trend of allowing people to request euthanasia at will.

Former Justice Secretary Lord Falconer countered Ms. Mahmood's claims, stating that she was mistaken in believing that the protections in the assisted dying bill were insufficient.

He stated to Sky News, “I believe her motivations stem from her religious beliefs, which I respect. However, those beliefs shouldn't be forced upon others.”

When asked about the controversy on Monday, Ms. Maskell spoke to BBC Radio 4’s Today program, stating, “I find it extremely offensive and discriminatory that he is mixing these two issues together, and I believe he should seriously reconsider his remarks.”

"I believe it's very unfair, and I think he ought to say sorry for making those statements."

As the crucial vote approaches, the outcome hangs in the balance. Supporters of the bill are confident they have garnered enough backing, while those against it think they might successfully thwart it.

In a major move on Friday, Gordon Brown expressed his opposition to the proposed law and advocated for the creation of a commission focused on enhancing palliative care.

Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn, Transport Secretary Louise Haigh, and Energy Secretary Ed Miliband have all expressed their support for the legislation.

Along with Ms. Mahmood and Mr. Streeting, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson and Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds have stated that they will oppose the bill.

Lord Falconer criticized those who oppose the bill for not following the rules. Last month, Cabinet Secretary Simon Case stated that the government would stay impartial regarding the bill and that ministers should refrain from engaging in public discussions about it.

In an interview with The Guardian, Lord Falconer remarked, "Those who violate the rules are receiving more attention due to the dramatic ways in which they are doing so."

A number of people against the proposed law change have expressed worries about the possibility of pressure and an expansion of its intent. They believe that the legislation has been hurried through the process.

A coalition of 29 religious leaders came together to express their opposition to the Bill in a joint letter on Sunday. They stated that they have serious worries that the legislation could lead to "dangerous abuse that threatens lives."

Ms. Leadbeater has characterized the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill as the strongest in the world, featuring “three levels of examination” that include approval from two medical professionals and a High Court judge.

It would also classify coercion as a crime, which could lead to a maximum penalty of 14 years in prison.

The legislation, applicable to England and Wales, specifies that only adults with a terminal illness who have fewer than six months to live and a firm desire to end their lives would qualify.

Lord Falconer was reached out to for his thoughts.