Change course on Rwanda now, Braverman tells Sunak after Jenrick resigns - BBC News
Need A TV Licence?
If you want to watch any channel or device's live TV and BBC programs on iPlayer, you must have one. This is a legal requirement.
Revised by Rob Corp
The times mentioned are based on UK time.
Braverman's Words?
Suella Braverman, an ex-Home Secretary, recently appeared in her debut radio interview after getting dismissed on the Today programme by the BBC Radio 4.
In case you desire further information on this matter, the interview with Suella Braverman will be talked about by Nick Robinson and Amol Rajan in the forthcoming episode of The Today Podcast.
What's Next For Braverman And His Allies?
The most prominent cautionary message given by Suella Braverman was that the bill is bound to be unsuccessful, as she urged Rishi Sunak to alter his approach.
The important matter at hand is what actions will be taken by Braverman and Conservative MPs who share her perspective if the prime minister fails to act accordingly.
Currently, we anticipate that the House of Commons will hold a second reading vote on the emergency bill next week. This particular vote centers on the fundamental principles of the legislation.
Should a sufficient number of Conservative MPs join with Labour to reject the bill, it is certain that Sunak's leadership over his party would be severely weakened. This could potentially lead to a vote of no confidence or even a snap election.
Therefore, Braverman and the conservative wing may choose to step back from taking action.
Although they may have concerns, public officials could still vote in favor of the bill at the moment. However, they may later attempt to make it stricter as it moves through the legislative process.
The Conservative Party would still reveal their disagreements, however, the situation would be less intense.
According to Braverman, she hasn't made up her mind yet. However, due to the government's sudden push for this legislation in the House of Commons, she'll have to make a decision about the extent of her involvement soon.
"Spreading Truth, Not Poison: My Message To The People"
Nick Robinson looks to Braverman's inspiration for publicly expressing their thoughts.
"You have criticized the party's leaders for being 'ineffective' and 'not displaying leadership qualities'... You have targeted judges, government officials, the chief of Metropolitan Police... homeless individuals, and immigrants... Could it be possible that you are only seeking attention by spreading negativity even within your own party?" he inquires.
To put it frankly, my intention was to be truthful," answers Braverman. "However, the fact remains that telling the truth can be uneasy."
According to Braverman, she doesn't hesitate to be straightforward with individuals and honestly express her thoughts.
"I apologize if it disturbs conventional society."
According to her, it's important to speak truthfully and transparently about the current situation. She believes it's time to stop letting down the citizens of Britain.
Robinson inquires if the "truthful response" is that everything revolves around you, continuously.
Braverman pauses for a moment before responding, "Actually, I don't agree with that. Yesterday, I addressed the policies and emphasized what actions we must take."
I strongly advise the Prime Minister to alter their direction and modify their approach.
Is Braverman Rooting For Sunak's Success?
When queried regarding Rishi Sunak's prospects in No 10 Downing Street, Braverman expressed her fervent desire for his ascension to success.
Nick Robinson, with a hint of disbelief, recites a portion of Braverman's written communication post her dismissal. Braverman's letter criticized Sunak by referring to him as hesitating, feeble, and devoid of essential skills in leading a team.
He inquires whether others can trust her true intention of wanting Sunak to prosper or if she aims to criticise and replace him in his position.
Braverman retorts that every one of us is a Conservative and expresses her desire for the Prime Minister to keep his word of halting the influx of boats.
She mentions that she has informed him about what needs to be done and now it is up to him to decide. She strongly suggests that he pay attention to the opinions of his MPs.
"Braverman Urges Sunak To Shift Stance On Illegal Migration"
In this blog post, Nick Robinson discusses how Braverman's previous superior, Rishi Sunak, is brought up in discussion. Robinson mentions a letter that Braverman wrote after she was fired a few weeks ago. In this "excoriating" letter, Braverman criticized the Prime Minister, stating that he was "incapable" of keeping promises that he never intended to fulfill.
According to Braverman, the task of the prime minister is quite demanding as there are many opposing elements that must be taken into account while making any decision.
I only have the knowledge that when I became the Home Secretary, I proposed a plan to block the entry of boats based on my previous collaborations with prime ministers. He assured me extensively that this plan could be executed.
In the end, he put an end to that idea.
Braverman expresses her desire for the prime minister to make a different decision, stating that there is still a chance for success. However, if the prime minister does not choose an alternative course of action, Braverman believes that the bill is doomed to fail.
Is Gov't Deceitful About Rwanda's Law Objections?
According to Robinson, a Downing Street representative declared today that Braverman is refusing to acknowledge the truth because Rwanda has stated that they will not participate in any agreement that violates global laws.
Braverman expresses her astonishment at the declaration.
Nick Robinson is questioning if the government is being truthful about the Rwandan authorities not proceeding with the agreement if it violates global regulations.
"What I mean is that there is a lack of logical consistency," she replies.
Once again, she is questioned about whether or not they are telling the truth.
"I'm not sure," Braverman responds.
Rwanda's Policy Won't Work: A Regrettable Truth - Braverman
Braverman was questioned regarding the negative critique expressed by Lord Sumption, a former Supreme Court judge, who disagreed with her stance on the bill's inability to prohibit legal disputes associated with flights to Rwanda.
The ex-chief of home affairs, who is also a certified lawyer, has expressed a different opinion and highlighted distinct provisions that permit diverse lawsuits to be initiated in the judicial system.
When Sumption was questioned about his statement that the courts will not prohibit the flights, Braverman contradicted him by stating that she has been involved in the legislation for multiple years and that he is mistaken.
According to Braverman, individuals seeking asylum will initiate legal actions, and she thinks that the judicial system will prevent plane departures to Rwanda.
In all honesty, the sad fact is that it just won't be effective. Furthermore, it won't put an end to the influx of boats. This viewpoint comes from my personal analysis after reading about it in the past day or two.
No More Talk, Action Needed - Braverman
During her appearance on Radio 4's Today show, Suella Braverman was questioned about whether or not her party is intentionally sabotaging itself.
Braverman expresses that their goal is contrary to allowing boats in. Instead, they aim to maintain the stability of the economy and provide for the citizens of Britain.
"We are in a highly hazardous predicament."
She believes that it's no longer appropriate to engage in mere conversations and make hollow pledges through slogans.
Catch Suella Braverman, Live!
As we have previously mentioned, former Home Secretary Suella Braverman is scheduled to appear on BBC Radio 4's Today program very soon.
Last month, Rishi Sunak dismissed her from her job and she proceeded to express harsh criticism towards his policy regarding Rwanda.
Tune in to the live broadcast by clicking the play button located at the upper section of the webpage.
Operating In Reality Is Crucial For Conservatives - Insider
A source from Downing Street has stated that Conservatives must face the truth and understand that they cannot have everything they want for the Rwanda plan. There is no perfect or ideal option available.
According to the source, the current bill is the sole solution to implementing an effective prevention plan before the election. The source also states that individuals who support taking a firm stance to combat illegal immigration must show their support for it.
Former Minister Urges Parliament To Classify Cats As Dogs
A past solicitor general for the Conservative party gave advice to the BBC that the government ought to take practical steps in dealing with immigration matters, instead of attempting to avoid legalities.
Edward Garnier, who worked alongside David Cameron during the period of 2010 to 2012, has expressed concerns about the government's proposal, which he believes is an instance of "imposing laws without allowing for any opposition or debate."
He released a message on BBC Radio 4's Today show.
The blog section can be rephrased as follows: The Parliament is being asked to enact a law that defines a cat as a dog, despite the absence of any proof to support this assertion. Furthermore, there is no provision for questioning the veracity of this law.
The government must come up with a feasible plan to tackle immigration, rather than attempting to avoid the issue by passing a law that seeks to create a division between the two major political parties. This is a ploy to shame or expose the Labour Party.
New Rwanda Bill: How It Works?
The section of the blog dedicated to home and legal matters.
The latest decision of the Supreme Court from the previous month showcased a unanimous decision from five justices who determined that Rwanda was inadequate in terms of safety. The ruling also included a comprehensive presentation of evidence, which highlighted various deep-rooted problems within the country's asylum system.
The government's plan aims to address this aspect of the loss by requesting Parliament to officially deem Rwanda as completely secure, while also prohibiting British judges from contradicting this declaration.
The purpose of this is to obstruct the courts from revisiting recorded proof of unfairness in the asylum program of Rwanda.
If we consider an unrealistic scenario where Rwanda is struck by civil war similar to that of 1994 (which is far-fetched at present), the British law would still declare it as a secure destination to dispatch individuals.
The proposal instructs judges and courts in the UK to disregard the parts of the Human Rights Act that specify guidelines on how to understand protections outlined in the European Convention of Human Rights. These include provisions such as the right to avoid torture and the right to a just trial in front of a court.
Furthermore, it prohibits judges from taking into account additional global regulations, particularly the Refugee Convention and the United Nations' prohibition on torture.
Ultimately, the statement declares that our judicial system must disregard any British legislation that obstructs the determination of the country’s safety. This holds significance as the highest court of law in the UK has acknowledged the existence of such laws.
Labour's McFadden: Tories In Turmoil
This morning, Pat McFadden, a senior member of the Labour Party, is making appearances on various television networks. During his interview on BBC Breakfast, he expressed his opinion that the Conservative Party is in turmoil due to an unsuccessful program.
According to McFadden, the Rwanda legislation that is causing controversy is expected to face significant opposition in the judicial system.
McFadden suggests that it's about time we change our approach and concentrate on cracking down on the unlawful gangs that are orchestrating this business. Furthermore, he remarks that the number of home secretaries sent to Rwanda surpasses that of asylum seekers brought in by the government.
He suggests that the funds allocated from the Rwanda program should be utilized for "increased enforcement and improved global collaboration".
Sunak Urges Tories To Unite; Jenrick Resigns
As we wake up to a new day, it appears that Rishi Sunak is facing the most serious challenge yet during his time in leadership.
Making a stand against immigration via boats has become the main focus of his political agenda.
Yesterday, Rwanda introduced new laws to deal with emergencies. These laws were powerful enough to prevent people from doing the wrong thing, which is what the government wanted. However, they didn't go so far as to ignore the rules set by human rights laws in Europe. The Rwandan government considered doing this, but ultimately decided against it.
Eventually, this agreement failed to appease Sunak's immigration minister.
What's next? We're still waiting for the primary vote on the legislation's principle next week. If the Conservative party's far-right and Labour teamed up to vote against it, that would be the most extreme option.
There are some recommendations stating that to prevent this situation, Sunak may declare it a vote of confidence. This would lead to MPs losing their support if they disobeyed him. However, it is uncertain if he has the required political power to follow through with this threat.
Amidst the buzz of Westminster, rumors suggest that Conservative MPs may soon instigate a vote of confidence in the leadership of Sunak.
There are certain individuals within the Conservative party who believe that the party's behavior is becoming increasingly disorderly, leading Sunak to possibly organize a general election prior to the previously intended date.
Just before Robert Jenrick stepped down from his position, Sunak spoke to Conservative MPs, reminding them of his previous message that they must come together in solidarity or face the consequences. This is a message he also emphasized when he first became prime minister in the previous year.
At the moment, they are definitely not coming together.
Braverman's First Interview Since Being Sacked
As we noted in our blog at 06:25, Suella Braverman will make an appearance on BBC Radio 4's Today show. This will be her initial live interview since Rishi Sunak removed her from her role as the Home Secretary last month.
She warned Members of Parliament on Wednesday, stating that if the Conservative party enforces the government's Rwanda legislation, which she believes is predestined to fail, the party will face complete electoral failure in just a few months.
Yesterday, Braverman addressed the Commons and issued a statement advocating for the bill to contain provisions that prevent any form of legal challenge that may hinder flights to Rwanda. Additionally, she stated several criteria that the bill must meet to achieve this objective.
At the moment, she is scheduled to have a conversation with Nick Robinson on Today at 08:10, and we will give an account of that discussion on this platform.
Tories Stuck In Cycle Of Chaos, Says Davey
We've received news from Sir Ed Davey, the leader of the Liberal Democrats. He believes that the government is incapable of breaking free from their recurring pattern of tumultuousness and inadequacy.
According to him, it seems that Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is incapable of leading any further. He goes on to call ministers "utterly inept" in their duties.
According to Davey, the Prime Minister ought to "act morally" and hold a nationwide election, as it is not addressing pressing concerns such as the affordability crisis and healthcare.
During an appearance on BBC Breakfast, Davey was asked about his approach to halt the influx of small boats crossing the channel, to which he emphasized the importance of addressing the prevailing issue of pending asylum applications.
He believes that the government should take further action to confront and tackle the "global criminal organizations" that are operating the boats, and he accuses the Conservatives of abandoning their supportive partners.
According to Davey, an essential step is to establish "secure and authorized avenues" for refugees to reach the UK. This allows the government to deal with their requests "prior to their arrival at the Channel."
Conservative Party's Gloomy Disposition
Rishi Sunak is trying to find a way for migrants to go to Rwanda that is legally acceptable, feasible, and politically acceptable.
In terms of the law, he must come up with a solution to deal with the worries of the Supreme Court, as they deemed his initial strategy illegal.
Essentially, his aim is to ensure that migrants are flown out to Rwanda prior to the upcoming national election.
He faces a political challenge where he must convince both the left and right factions of his party. The left is concerned about radical ideas, while the right is anxious about his lack of resolve to pursue them assertively.
However, the straightforward reality is that Robert Jenrick, a former immigration minister, believes that he is going to fail once more.
He had been having discussions with the leader of the country for nearly seven days regarding his worries - and presently he has stepped down.
This is significant as reducing unlawful migration holds significant value for numerous Conservative Members of Parliament and countless voters.
It is important to note that being a stabilizing force in the midst of Conservative disarray during his tenure as prime minister, after the tumultuous reigns of Liz Truss and Boris Johnson, means that a situation like this could cause unexpected turmoil. Think of it like a cork suddenly being launched over the wall of Downing Street.
Who's Robert Jenrick?
A person who used to work as a solicitor joined the Conservative party and became a Member of Parliament after winning the Newark by-election in 2014. This individual also secured the most votes in the seat during the 2015 general election.
In 2019, he took on the role of housing secretary in the cabinet under the leadership of former Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
Jenrick, who is 41 years old and has three children, had a short stint as a minor health minister in Liz Truss's administration. However, he announced support for Rishi Sunak to become the leader of the Conservative Party.
During his time as the minister responsible for immigration matters, he showed an unwavering commitment to taking a firmer stance against both legal and illegal immigration. He oftentimes expressed his feelings of dissatisfaction regarding the substantial influx of individuals in both categories.
He was involved in a number of incidents that caused controversy, one of which was a disagreement regarding the authorization of building plans for Conservative contributor Richard Desmond.
Jenrick faced backlash for his decision to have a painting of Disney characters removed from a children's asylum center.
Jenrick Resigns Amid Rebellion In The News
On Thursday's newspaper front pages, Robert Jenrick's resignation and Boris Johnson's appearance at the Covid inquiry are both highlighted.
The Guardian newspaper published an article today with the title "Trouble Among Conservatives".
The Daily Telegraph features a prominent picture of Suella Braverman on its front page, highlighting Jenrick's unsuccessful attempt to convince Rishi Sunak to grant ministers the authority to disregard the European Convention on Human Rights.
As per the Financial Times, the newly enacted law, released last night, does not comply with "a large portion of the global laws" - however, the followers of the Prime Minister argue that it is the highest limit of his capabilities.
The editorial comment on Thursday's Daily Mail is a captivating one, as it poses the question: "When will the Tories stop opposing each other and start opposing Labour?"
Wednesday's Events?
The intention was for Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to improve the government's asylum policy in Rwanda, following the Supreme Court's decision that it went against the law.
Yesterday's significant announcement was unfortunately overshadowed by Robert Jenrick's resignation as the immigration minister.
He expressed in his letter of resignation that the bill did not meet his expectations and was a product of unrealistic optimism.
As a comeback, the head minister commented that the resignation of Jenrick was not pleasing and originated from a "basic misconstruction of the circumstance."
The happenings of last night caused a few individuals within the Conservative Party to consider and discuss Sunak's potential destiny.
A Member of Parliament informed our political editor Chris Mason that they wouldn't be amazed if there was currently a ballot to express a lack of faith in his leadership.