Project 2025 – and why we should all be worried about it

Throughout the election, the Democratic campaign criticized Donald Trump for J.D. Vance's association with the contentious Project 2025, which aims to solidify the principles of Trumpism.

As the Republican candidate prepares to take office, you may be curious about what this extensive 900-page plan for a far-right government entails and how it could influence the upcoming presidential term.

Understanding Project 2025: An Overview

The full title of the initiative is the 2025 Presidential Transition Project, which aims to consolidate executive authority under a far-right President.

It suggests that Trump's initial term was hindered by a powerful bureaucracy that held excessive political influence. This is often referred to as the 'Deep State.'

This isn't the official policy statement from the Trump campaign.

More than 100 individuals who worked in his administration contributed to the development of Project 2025.

J.D. Vance’s connections to the powerful conservative organization, the Heritage Foundation, have led many to question how much he actually aligns with their views.

In addition to helping with the Heritage Foundation's policy reports, he recently penned a foreword for a book authored by Kevin D. Roberts, the leader of the think tank.

The Republican campaign has made efforts to separate itself from Project 2025.

Trump has stated that he hasn't gone through the plan himself. On the other hand, Vance has mentioned that the plan includes 'some solid ideas,' although he doesn't concur with every aspect of it.

What Does It Suggest?

It’s evident that the goals of Project 2025 to reshape the structure of the US Government are driven by ideological motivations.

The recent suggestions to simplify the process of dismissing public workers and replace them with candidates who align with certain ideological beliefs evoke a sense of the Red Scare.

The leader of the Heritage Foundation has even mentioned the idea of 'eliminating communists and socialists.'

Several federal agencies might be eliminated in the name of combating what some label as 'woke propaganda,' including the Department of Education. Additionally, organizations like the Centers for Disease Control and the Environmental Protection Agency could face reductions in size or be divided into separate entities.

As if the U.S. legal system wasn't already influenced by politics, the Heritage Foundation's proposals would remove the autonomy of the Department of Justice.

It's concerning that this is intended to ensure that its decisions align consistently with the President's policy goals and adhere to the rule of law.

As if we require Donald Trump to operate without any legal consequences.

The main goal of these suggestions is to simplify the process for a right-leaning President to implement conservative policies.

The proposed strategies include everything from ending the war on oil and gas to eliminating visa classifications for trafficking victims.

It suggests taking the abortion medication mifepristone off the shelves and eliminating phrases such as 'reproductive rights' from any laws and federal regulations.

In a larger sense, Project 2025 could grant excessive authority to "the leader of the free world." Essentially, it would empower a dominant figure like Trump even further.

What Are The Chances Of Their Introduction?

It appears improbable that Project 2025 will be completely put into action.

Trump and Vance have set themselves apart from the platform entirely. Several of the suggested changes are expected to spark debate within the Republican Party and could also face legal challenges.

However, this doesn't imply they won’t draw from it for ideas. In a speech made the day before the launch of Project 2025, Vance stated that the Heritage Foundation “will be a significant contributor in assisting us with governance at the White House, the Senate, the House, and throughout our wonderful nation.”

And that should give us cause for concern.

The ideas presented in Project 2025, whether it’s the Heritage Foundation’s stance on immigration or its strong backing of harmful fossil fuels, could affect everyone.

Related: Britain might soon find itself in a difficult situation with no easy options.